Loading your page…
We’re fetching this page. Servers are a little busy right now — thanks for your patience.
0%
Loading your page…
We’re fetching this page. Servers are a little busy right now — thanks for your patience.
0%
Dootsa research catalog
Study description for citation, Dataset Search, and secondary analysis of aggregate tables. View article
Disclaimer: 'KFC', 'Nando's', 'Chicken Licken' are registered trademarks of their respective owners. Their use in this report is for descriptive and comparative purposes only and does not imply any affiliation, endorsement, or sponsorship by Dootsa.
In a R177 billion market where KFC has long worn the crown, this Dootsa panel of 103 South Africans reveals a consumer base that is more value-driven, trust-sensitive, and open to switching than the leaders may expect. The findings map the loyalty landscape across South Africa's biggest chicken brands—and expose the fault lines challengers can exploit.
This survey captured fast-food preferences and loyalty drivers from 103 South African consumers (101 registered panel, 2 consented guests) between 6 July 2026 and 26 August 2026 — a 52-calendar-day fieldwork window. Respondents answered 15 questions covering brand visitation, loyalty, value perception, trust, and demographics. The panel was acquired 100% organically (49.5% organic, 31.1% referral, 18.4% direct, 1% survey join), with no paid respondent acquisition. Aggregated results are reported with small-cell suppression to protect respondent anonymity.
Sample composition demographics are reported as anonymised percentages of completed respondents; small cells are suppressed.
Provinces represented: Gauteng, Western Cape, Undisclosed (small sample), KwaZulu-Natal.
Completions: 101 registered panel (98.1%) and 2 consented guest (1.9%). Control-tower acquisition mix: Organic n=51 (49.5%); Referral n=32 (31.1%); Direct / untagged n=19 (18.4%); Survey join n=1 (1%).
Panel redemption totals were not recorded in this snapshot.
CPA (loyalty credits): Comprehensive Rocks Terms & Conditions are published on the Dootsa website (Terms §6 — Rocks and Rewards). This report discloses earning, redemption, expiry, and fieldwork redemption totals for transparency.
We process personal information lawfully, minimise collection, and protect respondent privacy. Public surveys collect only what is needed for research quality. We use device fingerprint hashing (not raw fingerprint data), Cloudflare Turnstile, IP rate limits (one submission per IP per survey per 24 hours), and hidden honeypot fields to filter automated submissions. Incomplete and abandoned sessions are counted in response totals for transparency. Only verified completions contribute to published insights. Respondents must confirm they are 18 years or older. Minimal optional fields (name and location) may be collected for insight context. Guest responses are screened before inclusion in creator analytics. Suspicious patterns may be flagged or excluded. Age confirmation: I confirm that I am 18 years or older and agree to Dootsa's Terms and Privacy Policy for this survey. Data use consent: I understand that my responses will be screened using anti-bot measures and may be used in aggregated research insights. Guest answers are stored encrypted at rest where required; only anonymised aggregates appear in public findings. Small demographic cells are suppressed (k-anonymity).
Questionnaires: 1. See appendix / codebook download for question wording and value labels.
Appendix — Survey instrument questions · Download codebook (CSV) · Markdown
The author declares no competing interests. Dootsa (Pty) Ltd conducted this research for internal publication and commercial insights purposes.
POPIA: Updated consent forms are in place; data collection methods for this fieldwork are designed to be POPIA-compliant. Public outputs are anonymised aggregates only.
CPA (loyalty credits): Comprehensive Rocks Terms & Conditions are published on the Dootsa website (Terms §6 — Rocks and Rewards). This report discloses earning, redemption, expiry, and fieldwork redemption totals for transparency.
Narrative framing: this report describes shopping preferences, convenience, and local identity cues in comparative terms. It does not judge, stigmatise, or moralise individual consumers or communities.
Disclaimer: 'KFC', 'Nando's', 'Chicken Licken' are registered trademarks of their respective owners. Their use in this report is for descriptive and comparative purposes only and does not imply any affiliation, endorsement, or sponsorship by Dootsa.
Methodology: detailed sampling, fieldwork duration, throughput, acquisition, and instrument notes appear above. Limitations and ethics appear under Data appraisal.
Public access to anonymised aggregate tables and the survey instrument codebook under the publication license. Individual-level microdata are not released.
Dootsa Research. The Ultimate Fast-Food Loyalty Test: KFC vs Nando's vs Chicken Licken. Version v1. Johannesburg: Dootsa [producer], 2026. https://www.dootsa.com/insights